ERPat vs GreatDay Payroll: From Mobile Attendance to a Finished Payslip
ERPat and GreatDay HR Payroll both connect attendance to pay, so the useful question is what happens between a field employee's time-in and a released payslip. This comparison follows that path step by step.
In this guide
What to watch for
Use the article to list what your current tool does well, where work gets re-entered, and what to test side by side.

In this article
- ERPat and GreatDay HR Payroll side by side
- What changes when attendance and payroll share one record
- Punches arrive from wherever your people work
- The rules are applied before anyone opens payroll
- A payslip your team can defend
- Year-end and the next module, from the same data
- Where GreatDay HR Payroll may still be the better fit
- Scenarios to run in a side-by-side demo
- The bottom line
For a company with staff spread across branches, stores or field routes, payroll is only as good as the attendance that feeds it. ERPat and GreatDay HR Payroll both connect time records to pay, which is exactly why the choice deserves a closer look than a feature checklist allows. If you are weighing ERPat as a GreatDay payroll alternative in the Philippines, the real test is the path between an employee's first punch of the cutoff and the payslip they open on release day. This guide follows that path; the HR records and multi-branch administration side has its own companion comparison.
ERPat and GreatDay HR Payroll side by side
| ERPat | GreatDay HR Payroll | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Philippine organizations that start with HRIS and payroll and add modules from the same platform as they grow | Mobile, branch and distributed teams |
| Core strength | Payroll fed straight from attendance, with configured overtime, night differential, rest day and holiday rules | Payroll connected to mobile attendance and HR |
| Philippine workflow notes | Configured SSS, PhilHealth and Pag-IBIG references; preparation support for BIR Form 2316, the annual alphalist and government remittance reporting | A Philippine offering; confirm the statutory outputs your package includes |
| What to verify in a demo | One of your real cutoffs, run end to end with your rate tables and approvers | Current statutory output formats and what the package actually includes |
What changes when attendance and payroll share one record
Punches arrive from wherever your people work
Distributed teams rarely clock in the same way. A branch cashier may tap a card at a terminal, a warehouse crew may use face or fingerprint recognition, and a field coordinator may log time from a phone. ERPat accepts all of these into the same attendance layer. Kiosk terminals capture attendance by face, fingerprint, RFID tap card or QR code, with dashboard monitoring for the people who supervise them. Syntry, the employee portal, lets staff record time in and out and their breaks from web or mobile, and an optional geofencing add-on adds GPS-based attendance validation for teams that clock in away from a fixed site. Biometric imports sit alongside these, so logs from a site's existing biometric device can still feed the same cutoff.
The rules are applied before anyone opens payroll
A time log on its own does not tell payroll much. What matters is how it is interpreted: was that extra hour approved overtime, did the shift cross into night differential hours, was the date a rest day or a holiday? ERPat applies configured overtime, night differential, rest day, holiday, leave and approval rules to attendance, and keeps every calculation and adjustment visible. Multi-shift and flexible schedules are defined in the same place, and leave flows through payroll-integrated workflows instead of arriving as a separate list. Because those rules are applied to attendance and every calculation stays visible, the payroll officer reviews computed hours instead of re-reading raw logs. You can test your own figures with the night differential calculator before a demo.
A payslip your team can defend
The payslip is where attendance mistakes become employee complaints. In ERPat, automated salary computation covers earnings, deductions, loans and amortization, with configured SSS, PhilHealth and Pag-IBIG references included directly in the computation. Rate tables are configured, approvals are required and adjustments stay traceable in payroll audit trails, so when a supervisor asks why an employee's net pay moved, the calculation and its adjustments are visible and traceable in the payroll audit trail. Employees see their payslips and attendance history in Syntry, so they can check their own hours against their pay. Bank-ready exports then close out the run. See how it fits together on the payroll overview.
Year-end and the next module, from the same data
Because payroll and employee tax records are structured from the start, ERPat supports Form 2316, tax summaries, annual alphalist preparation and government remittance reporting from the records you have been running all year. ERPat prepares these outputs; your team still approves the payroll, files the returns and remits the contributions. When the business needs more, you add modules from the same platform: offboarding with clearance checklists and final-pay handoff, or finance for accounts, expenses and loans. Multi-establishment support keeps several branches under one system, and where your process genuinely differs, ERPat is configured around your approved workflows, with larger custom requirements scoped and quoted separately by the same team that builds ERPat. Brilliant Skin Essentials is one published example of a company that modernized HR and timekeeping with ERPat's HRIS and the Syntry kiosk.
Where GreatDay HR Payroll may still be the better fit
GreatDay HR is a local peer with a clear focus. Its public product information positions it for mobile, branch and distributed teams, with payroll connected to mobile attendance and HR, and it is presented as a Philippine offering. If your workforce is highly mobile and your team has already built its daily routine around GreatDay's mobile attendance, that familiarity has real value, and switching tools mid-year carries its own cost.
It is also a reasonable choice when the scope you need is squarely HR, attendance and payroll, and you are comfortable with the package as offered. The deciding factor is rarely the label on a feature. It is whether the payroll output, statutory reports included, matches what your approvers and your accountant expect to receive.
Scenarios to run in a side-by-side demo
Bring one real cutoff to both vendors and ask each to run it with you. Useful scenarios include:
- A field employee who logs time from a phone for part of the cutoff and at a branch terminal for the rest, followed through to a single payslip.
- A cutoff that combines approved overtime, night differential hours and a holiday, with your own rate tables applied.
- A late or missing time-out, and how it is flagged, corrected and approved before payroll is finalized.
- A mid-cutoff joiner and a resignation, including how the leaver's final pay is handed off.
- A correction requested after approval, and the audit trail it leaves behind.
- The current statutory output formats each vendor produces for 2316, alphalist and remittance reporting, and which of them your package actually includes rather than which appear on a feature list.
- A gross-to-net check on a sample employee, which you can prepare in advance with the gross-to-net salary calculator.
The bottom line
Both platforms understand that distributed teams need attendance and payroll to connect. ERPat's case is that the connection runs all the way through: punches from kiosks, Syntry and biometric imports are interpreted by configured rules, computed into traceable payslips, and prepared into year-end and remittance reports, on a platform that can take on offboarding, finance and more when you are ready. The best way to judge that is with your own numbers, so book a demo and bring a cutoff that gave your team trouble.
For the wider field, see our top payroll software in the Philippines for 2026, and if your decision is more about HR administration across branches, read ERPat vs GreatDay HR.
ERPat System is developed by BytesCrafter, which publishes this blog. Details about GreatDay HR Payroll come from its public product information, reviewed in September 2026. Editions and features change, so confirm current scope with the vendor.
Compliance context
Turn "ERPat vs GreatDay Payroll: From Mobile Attendance to a Finished Payslip" into a compliance checklist
Compliance-heavy articles are most useful when they become a repeatable review habit. Treat the guidance as a way to confirm evidence, ownership and timing before reports or payroll records are submitted.
Part 1Documents and records to prepare
Before the team reviews compliance requirements, make sure the supporting records are complete and traceable.
- Employee master records, pay history, schedules, leaves and attendance logs
- Contribution, tax, deduction and adjustment summaries
- Approval records, exception notes and revision history
Part 2Common gaps to prevent
Compliance gaps often come from missing evidence rather than missing intent. The system should make proof easy to find.
- Late updates to employee status, salary rates or tax/contribution details
- Manual corrections without a reason or reviewer attached
- Reports generated from data that does not match the approved payroll run
Part 3How to make review repeatable
Create a simple rhythm: prepare records, run checks, document exceptions, approve, then lock the final version.
- Use the same checklist every cutoff or reporting period
- Assign one owner for exceptions and one owner for final approval
- Keep final reports and supporting details together for later audit review
Jerome Evangelista
Content & Solutions Writer
Writes about payroll automation, HRIS, and how Philippine businesses run leaner with ERPat.




